Last call for Oneiric seeds
lang.gerhard at gmail.com
Tue Aug 16 22:38:15 UTC 2011
Audacitie's cooperation with with jack is disgraceful. But indeed, for
it's capabilities I see no comparable linux alternative.
So I vote for retaining
Am 16.08.2011 09:02, schrieb David Henningsson:
> On 08/15/2011 03:38 PM, Scott Lavender wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:50 AM, David Henningsson
>> <david.henningsson at canonical.com
>> <mailto:david.henningsson at canonical.com>> wrote:
>> Hmm, seeds and that is not my area of expertise, but I seem to be
>> missing audacity?
>> David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
>> http://launchpad.net/~diwic <http://launchpad.net/%7Ediwic>
>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.__ubuntu.com
>> <mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> Audacity was consciously removed from the seeds.
>> I would infer that you believe it should included. May I ask why so?
> Well, the last time this was up for debate, you asked me to write down
> a use case or workflow, and so I did, see:
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-devel