Direction for Lucid+1

[Sergio Bello]

On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 17:27 +0100, Ricardo Lameiro wrote:

> Rosegarde is QT based, it will need to install a lot of QT libs, that
> few people will use. But i am not sure of this, since Qjackctl uses
> qt. Maybe rosegarden uses KDE libs... someone can clarify this?
> 

RG needs QT libs only (just like QJackCtl). KDE is a full featured
windows manager *based* on QT libs.
I have Ubuntu with Gnome + RoseGarden - but not KDE.

Sergio


> 2010/3/30 Fritz Meissner <meissner.fritz at gmail.com>
> 
>         
>         On 30 March 2010 15:49,  <ScottALavender at gmail.com> wrote:
>         > Is it too early to start thinking about a direction for
>         Ubuntu Studio after
>         > Lucid?
>         >
>         > My initial thoughts are we could focus on some other LV2
>         applications that
>         > were not included in Lucid but that would compliment what we
>         do have. This
>         > includes ingen, lv2-c++-tools, zynjacku, lv2rack and swh-lv2
>         packages.
>         >
>         > Additionally, there had been talk of migrating to JACK2.
>         This has the
>         > incredible benefit of allowing JACK and PulseAudio to place
>         nicely with each
>         > other if I understand it correctly.
>         >
>         > Any other thoughts, suggestions or criticisms?
>         >
>         > ScottL
>         
>         
>         
>         Rosegarden!
>         
>         Fritz
>         
>         --
>         Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
>         Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>         Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>         https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fagote / Contrafagote
> Bassoon / Contra-bassoon
> http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/attachments/20100330/06bfb143/attachment-0001.htm