Fonts in the Graphics Meta
imag1narynumber at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 21 01:21:29 BST 2009
> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:21:15 -0700
> Subject: Fonts in the Graphics Meta
> From: afterthebeep at gmail.com
> To: ubuntu-studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Hey everyone,
> I was up late working on a poster and for the life of me couldn't find
> the perfect font for the job. That's when I did an 'apt-cache search
> font' and realized that there's a massive cornucopia of font packages
> in the repositories awaiting my install. That's when I thought to
> myself: "Self, why aren't these font packages part of the Ubuntu
> Studio graphics meta package?"
> I think it would be organizationally best (if the list concurs that
> fonts in the graphics package would be good) to have a font meta
> package that is in turn a dependency of the graphics meta (simply
> because the sheer number of font packages would clutter the graphics
> package if added directly). The other question on my mind is "would
> it be okay to include non-free fonts in this meta?" and for that I
> turn the floor over to those more experienced...
> -Eric Hedekar
I agree that this is a good idea. I also agree with Cory K. in that only the free fonts would be bundled. And of course, those are the ones that should be used for paying gigs anyhow. :-)
Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Store, access, and share your photos. See how.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-devel