coryisatm at ubuntu.com
Mon Jul 7 15:54:16 BST 2008
Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Cory K. <coryisatm at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> I'm wondering if we should go through the trouble of creating to
>> metapackages for A/V codecs? The obvious free and nonfree.
>> They would include any audio *and* video codec that fits into either
>> category. "Free" could ship on the disks.
>> -Cory \m/
> Codecs are in a legal void I am not very clear about. I would need
> somebody to clarify me how does Ubuntu and Canonical deal with sharing
> codecs that don't explicitely permit this in their license uses. Maybe
> having a metapackage of so in an official project as Ubuntu Studio is
> a lawyer no no.
I shoulda mentioned this. Maybe just split the 2 based on archive.
free=Universe, nonfree=Multiverse. That way, we should be clear. And the
lists that actually make up the metas is up for debate. I'm more just
wondering about the validity of the idea.
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-devel