"ubuntustudio" meta package.

[Toma]

What about having ubuntustudio-audio+ubuntustudio-desktop rebadged to
simply ubntustudio-audio? And doing the same thng across the board.
That way, the dependencies are all there and if you want to install
say, ubuntustudio-art, then it will just say 'gnome gdm blah blah
already installed' and simply fill in the missing gaps?
Not sure if that would create horror stories if you use aptitude to
remove a meta package...

Toma-


On 11/01/2008, hollunder at gmx.at <hollunder at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:04:06 -0500
> "Cory K." <coryisatm at nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > This little idea was brought up in a chat so I thought Id bring it
> > here to work it out.
> >
> > So the idea was something that would pull the art, -rt and the metas
> > and would be 1 package users could install and get Ubuntu Studio.
> >
> > Questions:
> > *Should* we make it a kinda all-or-nothing installs that pulls all the
> > metas?
> > Can it query for a -desktop package and pull ubuntustudio-desktop if
> > it doesnt find one?
> >
> > That should start things off.
> >
> > -Cory \m/
>
> All or nothing for the lazy people sounds good, but I wish there was
> also a further split.
> It would be nice if one would be able to just get the kernel and
> settings necessary for audio without any other stuff. Afaik at
> least the settings come with some other stuff (in Gutsy at
> least).
> Graphics and video also separate.
>
> Philipp
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
>