[Bug 2123886] Autopkgtest regression report (util-linux/2.41-4ubuntu4.1)
Ubuntu SRU Bot
2123886 at bugs.launchpad.net
Sun Nov 30 10:57:28 UTC 2025
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted util-linux (2.41-4ubuntu4.1) for questing have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
adduser/3.152ubuntu1 (armhf)
cmake-extras/1.8-1 (armhf)
cron/3.0pl1-196ubuntu2 (armhf)
glib2.0/unknown (armhf)
gsequencer/7.7.5-2 (arm64)
libdap/3.21.1-2build1 (armhf)
netplan.io/unknown (armhf)
network-manager/1.52.0-1ubuntu3.1 (amd64, arm64, ppc64el)
openjdk-21/21.0.9+10-1~25.10 (arm64, armhf, ppc64el)
openjdk-25/25.0.1+8-1~25.10 (arm64)
python3.13/unknown (armhf)
python3.14/3.14.0-1 (amd64, armhf)
systemd/257.9-0ubuntu2 (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/questing/update_excuses.html#util-linux
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2123886
Title:
Add missing ARM-cores to support Vera-based systems
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in util-linux source package in Noble:
Fix Committed
Status in util-linux source package in Plucky:
Fix Committed
Status in util-linux source package in Questing:
Fix Committed
Status in util-linux source package in Resolute:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[Impact]
When running "lscpu" on a Vera-based system, it doesn't report a model
name:
Vendor ID: ARM
Model: 0
[Fix]
Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the
problem. The commit below adds the specific codes missing from Noble's
(and previous) versions.
https://github.com/util-linux/util-
linux/commit/908777470d403ec30c525472ba0d3701c9c5a223
[Test Steps]
* Verify whether output of lscpu is correct on new CPUs; eg:
Vendor ID: ARM
Model name: Olympus
* Verify whether output of lscpu doesn't change on old CPUs; eg:
Vendor ID: ARM
Model name: Neoverse-N1
[What Could Go Wrong]
The fix only introduces additional model identifiers to match
against and print a model name string, thus regression impact
should be contained within lscpu and printing cpus model name
on ARM systems.
Output doesn't change on systems with non-affected CPU models.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2123886/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors
mailing list