[Bug 2133149] Re: [needs-packaging] resources

[Alessandro Astone]

>.should follow the other rustc packages, e.g. rustc-resources.

This is a user-facing application, not a rust library. What does it
matter that it's rust? I don't think it should be reflected in the name.

It's unfair to call it gnome-resources when it's not gnome-core... Other
ideas?

> there's missing copyright about the 213 sub directories files in
debian/mising-sources.

Mh, I haven't seen other packages vendoring rust libraries that
documents their copyright

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2133149

Title:
  [needs-packaging] resources

Status in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I have packaged the Resources app (System Monitor alternative).
  The source package is available at https://launchpad.net/~aleasto/+archive/ubuntu/resources/+sourcepub/17841243/+listing-archive-extra with rich VCS history at https://salsa.debian.org/ubuntu-dev-team/resources (gbp-style)

  The package will be submitted to debian at a later time, as it
  currently lacks some rust dependencies. It can build in Ubuntu because
  we prefer to vendor all rust dependencies, as per MIR requirements.

  I need sponsoring to upload the package to the NEW queue.
  Please care to strip out the ~ppaX suffix if downloading the sources from my ppa.

  Thanks.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2133149/+subscriptions