[Bug 2095011] Re: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

[Luca Boccassi]

In my experience SRUs tend to get stonewalled and end up going nowhere,
backports are much easier and actually end up happening. It's entirely
fine for our use case for this to be in backports, so I'm ok with this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095011

Title:
  [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

Status in sphinxcontrib-globalsubs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in sphinxcontrib-globalsubs source package in Noble:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This is a new package providing a sphinx extension available in
  Plucky. It will be necessary to build the manpages for systemd in the
  near future after this upstream PR is merged:
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/33673

  In order to allow developers running on Noble to develop on systemd
  upstream smoothly, having the package available in noble-backports
  will ensure the experience works out of the box and without hiccups.

  [Scope]

  Backport version 0.1.2-2 from plucky to noble-backports

  [Other Info]

  The existing package in this source is unchanged, just a dch --bpo
  changelog entry with the appropriate version, such as:

  sphinxcontrib-globalsubs (0.1.2-2~bpo24.04.1) noble-backports;
  urgency=medium

    * Rebuild for noble-backports. (LP: #2095011)

   -- Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>  Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:12:59 +0000

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/+bug/2095011/+subscriptions