[Bug 2092053] Re: openafs-modules-dkms FTBS in Noble with linux-6.11-hwe kernel
Timo Aaltonen
2092053 at bugs.launchpad.net
Thu Dec 19 11:04:40 UTC 2024
Hello Massimiliano, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openafs into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/1.8.10-2.1ubuntu3.3 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance for helping!
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092053
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms FTBS in Noble with linux-6.11-hwe kernel
Status in openafs package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in openafs source package in Noble:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
[ Impact ]
openafs-modules-dkms does not compile from source in Noble with kernel
6.11:
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_alloc.c: In function ‘linux_alloc_init’:
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_alloc.c:212:37: error: ‘vmalloc’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘mm_alloc’?
212 | (void *)vmalloc, local_free);
| ^~~~~~~
| mm_alloc
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_module.c:25:10: fatal error: asm/ia32_unistd.h: No such file or directory
25 | #include <asm/ia32_unistd.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c: In function ‘afs_linux_lock’:
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c:732:23: error: ‘struct file_lock’ has no member named ‘fl_type’
732 | flock.l_type = flp->fl_type;
| ^~
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c:733:24: error: ‘struct file_lock’ has no member named ‘fl_pid’; did you mean ‘fl_end’?
733 | flock.l_pid = flp->fl_pid;
| ^~~~~~
| fl_end
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c:755:26: error: ‘struct file_lock’ has no member named ‘fl_type’
755 | if ((code == 0 || flp->fl_type == F_UNLCK) &&
| ^~
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c:758:24: error: ‘struct file_lock’ has no member named ‘fl_type’
758 | if (code && flp->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
| ^~
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c:773:16: error: ‘struct file_lock’ has no member named ‘fl_type’
773 | if (flp->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
| ^~
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c:780:8: error: ‘struct file_lock’ has no member named ‘fl_type’
780 | flp->fl_type = flock.l_type;
| ^~
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c:781:10: error: ‘struct file_lock’ has no member named ‘fl_pid’; did you mean ‘fl_end’?
781 | flp->fl_pid = flock.l_pid;
| ^~~~~~
| fl_end
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c: In function ‘afs_linux_read_cache’:
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.10/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-6.11.0-12-generic-SP/osi_vnodeops.c:2381:27: error: implicit declaration of function ‘page_cache_alloc’; did you mean ‘kmem_cache_alloc’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2381 | newpage = page_cache_alloc(cachemapping);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| kmem_cache_alloc
[ Test case ]
Install the latest linux-6.11 kernel on Noble:
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:canonical-kernel-team/ppa
$ sudo apt update
$ sudo apt install linux-image-6.11.0-12-generic \
linux-modules-6.11.0-12-generic \
linux-modules-extra-6.11.0-12-generic \
linux-headers-6.11.0-12-generic
Install openafs-modules-dkms:
$ sudo apt install openafs-modules-dkms
Load the module:
$ sudo modprobe openafs
The same procedure should be repeated on linux-6.8 to test for
possible regressions.
[ Fix ]
Patch the code to properly support the new linux 6.11 ABI.
[ Regression potential ]
We may experience regressions in systems that are using openafs with
the new 6.11 kernel.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/2092053/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors
mailing list