[Bug 2027961] Re: [BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic

Ɓukasz Zemczak 2027961 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Jul 18 13:01:56 UTC 2023


Hello Phil! Thank you for filling in the bug and preparing the debdiff!
As this seems to be an update to the backports pocket, I'll tweak the
diff before sponsoring. Let me first check if the contents are sane and
then proceed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2027961

Title:
   [BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic

Status in rednotebook package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Provides many fixes and enhancements.
   * As the Debian Maintainer (DM) of this package for many years, this is a service I provide in Debian.
   * Low impact. Backporting works well in Debian and the track history is sound.

  [Scope]

   * Backport from mantic - 23.10.
   * Backport from future development releases where reliability/stability allows.

   * Backport to jammy - 22.04 LTS.

   * No backports to non-LTS versions - Ever. Backports are for long
  term users running LTS only.

   * Why a backport and not SRU? The amount of changes that benefit the
  user. Risk?[1]

  [Other Info]
   
   * I am the Debian Maintainer (DM) of this package and have been for many years and will provide fixes and/or updates.
   * I am used to strictly managing the upgrade path.
   * Build has been tested and is available at: https://launchpad.net/~kathenas/+archive/ubuntu/rednotebook

  [1] A python package is less dangerous to backport than others and the
  possible risks are low.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rednotebook/+bug/2027961/+subscriptions




More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors mailing list