[Bug 2027961] Re: [BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic
Ćukasz Zemczak
2027961 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Jul 18 13:01:56 UTC 2023
Hello Phil! Thank you for filling in the bug and preparing the debdiff!
As this seems to be an update to the backports pocket, I'll tweak the
diff before sponsoring. Let me first check if the contents are sane and
then proceed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2027961
Title:
[BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic
Status in rednotebook package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
[Impact]
* Provides many fixes and enhancements.
* As the Debian Maintainer (DM) of this package for many years, this is a service I provide in Debian.
* Low impact. Backporting works well in Debian and the track history is sound.
[Scope]
* Backport from mantic - 23.10.
* Backport from future development releases where reliability/stability allows.
* Backport to jammy - 22.04 LTS.
* No backports to non-LTS versions - Ever. Backports are for long
term users running LTS only.
* Why a backport and not SRU? The amount of changes that benefit the
user. Risk?[1]
[Other Info]
* I am the Debian Maintainer (DM) of this package and have been for many years and will provide fixes and/or updates.
* I am used to strictly managing the upgrade path.
* Build has been tested and is available at: https://launchpad.net/~kathenas/+archive/ubuntu/rednotebook
[1] A python package is less dangerous to backport than others and the
possible risks are low.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rednotebook/+bug/2027961/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors
mailing list