[Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
1771740 at bugs.launchpad.net
Thu Sep 30 12:33:17 UTC 2021
The attachment "focal.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-
sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe
the team.
[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771740
Title:
Expose link offload options
Status in netplan:
Fix Committed
Status in netplan.io package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in netplan.io source package in Focal:
New
Status in netplan.io source package in Hirsute:
New
Status in netplan.io source package in Impish:
New
Bug description:
[Impact]
* An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
* justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
* In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an
explanation of how the upload fixes this bug.
[Test Plan]
* detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug
* these should allow someone who is not familiar with the affected
package to reproduce the bug and verify that the updated package fixes
the problem.
* if other testing is appropriate to perform before landing this update,
this should also be described here.
[Where problems could occur]
* Think about what the upload changes in the software. Imagine the change is
wrong or breaks something else: how would this show up?
* It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the
event of a regression.
* This must '''never''' be "None" or "Low", or entirely an argument as to why
your upload is low risk.
* This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
[Other Info]
* Anything else you think is useful to include
* Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams and the Technical Board
* and address these questions in advance
[Original Description]
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.link.html has
a number of [Link] options which I need to use for a flaky network
card (TCPSegmentationOffload, TCP6SegmentationOffload,
GenericSegmentationOffload, GenericReceiveOffload,
LargeReceiveOffload) which are not exposed via netplan.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1771740/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors
mailing list