[Bug 1932449] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta

Bin Li 1932449 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Aug 3 06:25:24 UTC 2021


Attach oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-
scripts 1.6.

** Summary changed:

- [DRAFT][MIR] oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta
+ [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta

** Description changed:

- [DRAFT][Availability]
+ [Background]
+ 
+ Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details.
+ 
+ [Impact]
+ 
+  1. Upgrade path: Users will be upgrading from a package in the associated OEM archive, not the Ubuntu archive.
+  2. The background and impact of the situation for this change, and it's impact.
+ 
+ [Testing]
+ 
+  1. Test that `ubuntu-drivers list-oem` lists the meta-package on the relevant hardware
+  2. Test that fully installing the meta-package (upgrading to the OEM archive if relevant) works properly on the  hardware
+  3. Do an offline install. Boot the system. Run update-manager. Check that an upgrade to the OEM package is offered and that it completes successfully and the hardware works properly.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ 
+ Most potential regressions will live in the package set that will be
+ installed via dependency of this package, which live in OEM archive
+ (outside of Ubuntu) and control by OEM team. OEM team and other
+ corresponding team need take responsibility of those dependency
+ installed.
+ 
+ [When switching kernel flavour] Check that the new kernel flavour works
+ on the target platform.
+ 
+ [Availability]
  This is a meta package for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM that means the package doesn't exist in Debian or Ubuntu archive yet.
  The source code of the oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta for focal:
      git clone -b simon.cabernet-focal-ubuntu https://git.launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-engineers/pc-enablement/+git/oem-sutton-projects-meta
  
  [Rationale]
  We want to improve the hardware support for some Lenovo platforms.
  
  [Security]
  No CVE/known security issue.
  
  [Quality assurance]
  I have used ppa:oem-solutions-engineers/oem-projects-meta to check this package on some Lenovo platforms.
  oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta will be upgraded to 20.04ubuntu1 or latest version from OEM archive.
  
  [Dependencies]
  It only depends on ubuntu-oem-keyring.
  
  [Standards compliance]
  This package should have met all requirements of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM.
  
  [Maintenance]
  Canonical OEM Enablement Team will take care of the maintenance.
  
  [Background information]
  Please check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM for details.
  
  Please use "oem-metapackage-mir-check" in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools to
  verify this MIR against the reference package in the archive.
+ 
+ https://ubuntu.com/certified/202104-28958

** Changed in: oem-priority
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu
       Status: New => Confirmed

** Patch added: "oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932449/+attachment/5515471/+files/oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff

** Tags removed: oem-scripts-0.98
** Tags added: oem-scripts-1.6 ubuntu-certified

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932449

Title:
  [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [Background]

  Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details.

  [Impact]

   1. Upgrade path: Users will be upgrading from a package in the associated OEM archive, not the Ubuntu archive.
   2. The background and impact of the situation for this change, and it's impact.

  [Testing]

   1. Test that `ubuntu-drivers list-oem` lists the meta-package on the relevant hardware
   2. Test that fully installing the meta-package (upgrading to the OEM archive if relevant) works properly on the  hardware
   3. Do an offline install. Boot the system. Run update-manager. Check that an upgrade to the OEM package is offered and that it completes successfully and the hardware works properly.

  [Regression Potential]

  Most potential regressions will live in the package set that will be
  installed via dependency of this package, which live in OEM archive
  (outside of Ubuntu) and control by OEM team. OEM team and other
  corresponding team need take responsibility of those dependency
  installed.

  [When switching kernel flavour] Check that the new kernel flavour
  works on the target platform.

  [Availability]
  This is a meta package for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM that means the package doesn't exist in Debian or Ubuntu archive yet.
  The source code of the oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta for focal:
      git clone -b simon.cabernet-focal-ubuntu https://git.launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-engineers/pc-enablement/+git/oem-sutton-projects-meta

  [Rationale]
  We want to improve the hardware support for some Lenovo platforms.

  [Security]
  No CVE/known security issue.

  [Quality assurance]
  I have used ppa:oem-solutions-engineers/oem-projects-meta to check this package on some Lenovo platforms.
  oem-sutton.simon-cabernet-meta will be upgraded to 20.04ubuntu1 or latest version from OEM archive.

  [Dependencies]
  It only depends on ubuntu-oem-keyring.

  [Standards compliance]
  This package should have met all requirements of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM.

  [Maintenance]
  Canonical OEM Enablement Team will take care of the maintenance.

  [Background information]
  Please check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM for details.

  Please use "oem-metapackage-mir-check" in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools to
  verify this MIR against the reference package in the archive.

  https://ubuntu.com/certified/202104-28958

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1932449/+subscriptions




More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors mailing list