[Bug 1432741] Re: [FFe] sdl1.2 needs mir support patch

[Timo Jyrinki]

** Summary changed:

- sdl1.2 needs mir support patch
+ [FFe] sdl1.2 needs mir support patch

** Description changed:

+ Asking for FFe for the libsdl1.2 Mir patch. It would be a nice bonus for
+ 16.10 Mir users as there are a lot of interesting SDL 1.2 applications
+ out there.
+ 
+ Builds fine and can be tested from https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
+ service/+archive/ubuntu/1996/+packages
+ 
+ --- original report below ---
+ 
  There is a branch here with mir support:
  lp:~brandontschaefer/+junk/sdl1.2-mir
  
  From here theres one more patch from Marco I need to get into the main
  branch then propose an actual patch for main.

** Description changed:

  Asking for FFe for the libsdl1.2 Mir patch. It would be a nice bonus for
  16.10 Mir users as there are a lot of interesting SDL 1.2 applications
  out there.
  
  Builds fine and can be tested from https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
  service/+archive/ubuntu/1996/+packages
+ 
+ The diff is in comment #1, I just changed it to be debian/patches/mir-
+ support.patch and only applied the debian/control change directly.
  
  --- original report below ---
  
  There is a branch here with mir support:
  lp:~brandontschaefer/+junk/sdl1.2-mir
  
  From here theres one more patch from Marco I need to get into the main
  branch then propose an actual patch for main.

** Description changed:

  Asking for FFe for the libsdl1.2 Mir patch. It would be a nice bonus for
  16.10 Mir users as there are a lot of interesting SDL 1.2 applications
  out there.
  
  Builds fine and can be tested from https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
  service/+archive/ubuntu/1996/+packages
  
  The diff is in comment #1, I just changed it to be debian/patches/mir-
  support.patch and only applied the debian/control change directly.
  
+ As can be seen, the patch is clean and the codepaths shouldn't be
+ encountered in non-Mir situations so risks should be low.
+ 
  --- original report below ---
  
  There is a branch here with mir support:
  lp:~brandontschaefer/+junk/sdl1.2-mir
  
  From here theres one more patch from Marco I need to get into the main
  branch then propose an actual patch for main.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432741

Title:
  [FFe] sdl1.2 needs mir support patch

Status in libsdl1.2 package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Asking for FFe for the libsdl1.2 Mir patch. It would be a nice bonus
  for 16.10 Mir users as there are a lot of interesting SDL 1.2
  applications out there.

  Builds fine and can be tested from https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-
  ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/1996/+packages

  The diff is in comment #1, I just changed it to be debian/patches/mir-
  support.patch and only applied the debian/control change directly.

  As can be seen, the patch is clean and the codepaths shouldn't be
  encountered in non-Mir situations so risks should be low.

  --- original report below ---

  There is a branch here with mir support:
  lp:~brandontschaefer/+junk/sdl1.2-mir

  From here theres one more patch from Marco I need to get into the main
  branch then propose an actual patch for main.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl1.2/+bug/1432741/+subscriptions