[Bug 1609110] [NEW] Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/<arch>?
Launchpad Bug Tracker
1609110 at bugs.launchpad.net
Fri Aug 5 00:29:15 UTC 2016
You have been subscribed to a public bug by Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton):
One of our mesa changes means we can't sync Wine packages (or wine-
development stuck in proposed) from Debian. See bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827770
We purposely end up creating in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
mesa/ld.so.conf
mesa/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1.2.0
mesa/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2.0
mesa/libGL.so.1.2.0
libGL.so -> mesa/libGL.so
Debian on the other hand just creates:
libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2.0
libGL.so.1.2.0
I haven't found a clear reason for the divergence. I do see some
comments about making it work with the alternates system. I'm not sure
if that's current though. Long term libglvnd should help there in a
better way (IIUC).
For reference Fedora does:
/usr/lib64/libGL.so.1
/usr/lib64/libGL.so.1.2.0
Can we drop these Debian differences from mesa for Yakkety?
** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: patch
--
Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/<arch>?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609110
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Sponsors Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors
mailing list