[Bug 1542928] Re: python-scientific should be removed
Colin Watson
cjwatson at canonical.com
Wed Apr 20 09:14:40 UTC 2016
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-archive since the Debian task is still open and
shows up on our subscribed list. Feel free to resubscribe us if there
are more actions for us.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542928
Title:
python-scientific should be removed
Status in dolfin package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in fenics package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in gpivtools package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in mmtk package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in python-scientific package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in sixpack package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in python-scientific package in Debian:
Confirmed
Bug description:
The latest netcdf package (1:4.4.0-1 ) is stuck in -proposed. This is presumably because the transition is waiting for python-scientific:
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/netcdf.html
python-scientific does not build because it is not compatible with the latest numPy (1.9), and will probably not be fixed before the Debian Import Freeze:
https://bitbucket.org/khinsen/scientificpython/issues/13/numpy-19-has-dropped-support-for
As you can see from that bug, python-scientific has been removed from most distributions (including Debian Testing).
Python-scientific should probably be removed from Ubuntu Xenial
(16.04) as well.
The reverse dependencies have also been removed in Debian Testing and should also be removed from Ubuntu Xenial:
- sixpack
- mmtk
- dolfin
- gpivtools
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dolfin/+bug/1542928/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors
mailing list