[Bug 1004678] Re: Release 12.05

Andreas Hasenack andreas at canonical.com
Thu Jun 21 23:54:24 UTC 2012


** Description changed:

+ WORK IN PROGRESS
+ 
+ Do not act on this bug yet as it is missing many things. I'm still
+ running the landscape release tests.
+ 
+ 
  [Impact]
  <fill me in with explanation of severity and frequency of bug on users and justification for backporting the fix to the stable release>
  
  [Text Case]
  <fill me in with detailed *instructions* on how to reproduce the bug.  This will be used by people later on to verify the updated package fixes the problem.>
  1.
  2.
  3.
- Broken Behavior: 
- Fixed Behavior: 
+ Broken Behavior:
+ Fixed Behavior:
  
  [Regression Potential]
  <fill me in with a discussion of how regressions would typically manifest as a result of this change.  It's assumed that all candidate patches are well-tested and have low overall risk of regression; but if there's an area of concern be sure to call it out so testers can check it.>
  
  [Original Report]SRU request to update landscape-client to version 12.05
  in lucid, natty, oneiric and precise.
  
  Landscape has an SRU exception provided the mentioned rules are followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Landscape
  
  Major changes:
  - Make change-packages also handle package holds (LP: #972489). This is the driving reason for this SRU.
  - packaging:
    - previous package was a bit messy in the sense that upstream tarball had a debian directory, and the ubuntu package patched some files in there. So now upstream has no debian structure and the ubuntu package is format "3.0 (quilt)".
    - assorted other changes as a result of lintian suggestions
    - make all subpackages that depend on each other require the exact same
      version, instead of >= $version.
    - Added python-gi to client depends starting natty.
  - Drop smart related code and tests since it's no longer used

** Description changed:

  WORK IN PROGRESS
  
  Do not act on this bug yet as it is missing many things. I'm still
- running the landscape release tests.
- 
+ running the landscape SRU tests.
  
  [Impact]
  <fill me in with explanation of severity and frequency of bug on users and justification for backporting the fix to the stable release>
  
  [Text Case]
  <fill me in with detailed *instructions* on how to reproduce the bug.  This will be used by people later on to verify the updated package fixes the problem.>
  1.
  2.
  3.
  Broken Behavior:
  Fixed Behavior:
  
  [Regression Potential]
  <fill me in with a discussion of how regressions would typically manifest as a result of this change.  It's assumed that all candidate patches are well-tested and have low overall risk of regression; but if there's an area of concern be sure to call it out so testers can check it.>
  
  [Original Report]SRU request to update landscape-client to version 12.05
  in lucid, natty, oneiric and precise.
  
  Landscape has an SRU exception provided the mentioned rules are followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Landscape
  
  Major changes:
  - Make change-packages also handle package holds (LP: #972489). This is the driving reason for this SRU.
  - packaging:
    - previous package was a bit messy in the sense that upstream tarball had a debian directory, and the ubuntu package patched some files in there. So now upstream has no debian structure and the ubuntu package is format "3.0 (quilt)".
    - assorted other changes as a result of lintian suggestions
    - make all subpackages that depend on each other require the exact same
      version, instead of >= $version.
    - Added python-gi to client depends starting natty.
  - Drop smart related code and tests since it's no longer used

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004678

Title:
  Release 12.05

Status in Landscape Client:
  Fix Released
Status in “landscape-client” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “landscape-client” source package in Lucid:
  New
Status in “landscape-client” source package in Natty:
  New
Status in “landscape-client” source package in Oneiric:
  New
Status in “landscape-client” source package in Precise:
  New

Bug description:
  WORK IN PROGRESS

  Do not act on this bug yet as it is missing many things. I'm still
  running the landscape SRU tests.

  [Impact]
  <fill me in with explanation of severity and frequency of bug on users and justification for backporting the fix to the stable release>

  [Text Case]
  <fill me in with detailed *instructions* on how to reproduce the bug.  This will be used by people later on to verify the updated package fixes the problem.>
  1.
  2.
  3.
  Broken Behavior:
  Fixed Behavior:

  [Regression Potential]
  <fill me in with a discussion of how regressions would typically manifest as a result of this change.  It's assumed that all candidate patches are well-tested and have low overall risk of regression; but if there's an area of concern be sure to call it out so testers can check it.>

  [Original Report]SRU request to update landscape-client to version
  12.05 in lucid, natty, oneiric and precise.

  Landscape has an SRU exception provided the mentioned rules are followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Landscape

  Major changes:
  - Make change-packages also handle package holds (LP: #972489). This is the driving reason for this SRU.
  - packaging:
    - previous package was a bit messy in the sense that upstream tarball had a debian directory, and the ubuntu package patched some files in there. So now upstream has no debian structure and the ubuntu package is format "3.0 (quilt)".
    - assorted other changes as a result of lintian suggestions
    - make all subpackages that depend on each other require the exact same
      version, instead of >= $version.
    - Added python-gi to client depends starting natty.
  - Drop smart related code and tests since it's no longer used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/1004678/+subscriptions



More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors mailing list