[Bug 980773] Re: Sync fcitx 1:4.2.2-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

[Martin Pitt]

I agree that the im-switch fix would be better off with a cherry-pick.
As long as it is not entirely broken, it's much safer to do that as an
SRU.

Does the new fcitx version actually require all those new packages, or
are these independent? I. e. can the new versions be SRUed and tested
one by one?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980773

Title:
  Sync fcitx 1:4.2.2-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

Status in “fcitx” package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Please sync fcitx 1:4.2.2-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

  Changelog entries since current precise version 1:4.2.0-1:

  fcitx (1:4.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low

     * New upstream release.
     * rm rec: kdebase-bin, sug: plasma-widgets-addons.
   -- YunQiang Su <wzssyqa at gmail.com>  Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:46:08 +0800

  fcitx (1:4.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low

    * Install fcitx-quickphrase.desc

   -- Aron Xu <aron at debian.org>  Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:02:01 +0800

  fcitx (1:4.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low

    * New upstream release.
    * debian/im-switch/fcitx:
      - Change to QT_IM_MODULE from QT4_IM_MODULE to work around
        im-switch bug.

   -- Aron Xu <aron at debian.org>  Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:59:56 +0800

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcitx/+bug/980773/+subscriptions