[Bug 705734] Re: Xubuntu-docs for lucid are out-dated

Micah Gersten launchpad at micahscomputing.com
Fri Jan 21 19:11:16 UTC 2011


Uploaded to lucid-proposed

** Changed in: xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Lucid)
       Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Lucid)
     Assignee: Micah Gersten (micahg) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705734

Title:
  Xubuntu-docs for lucid are out-dated

Status in “xubuntu-docs” package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in “xubuntu-docs” source package in Lucid:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: xubuntu-docs

  TEST CASE:
  Xubuntu-docs have been outdated for quite some time, and currently to not provide adequate instruction on how to perform various tasks in Xubuntu 10.04. I have made many corrections/changes for the Natty version of xubuntu-docs that are relevant to the Lucid version (9.10.1). These changes update some instructions and references of default programs installed in Xubuntu 10.04.  

  In a conversation with the Technical Board,
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-
  board/2010-December/000610.html, it was stated that I could address
  several bugs in xubuntu-docs through a single bug report, and this is
  my attempt to do so.  The updated changelog,
  http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/xubuntu-
  docs/lucid/view/head:/debian/changelog, lists all of the bugs that
  have been fixed by the following changes.  The fixed bugs can also be
  found here, lp:xubuntu-docs/lucid.

  All of the changes to xubuntu-docs have been committed to bazaar,
  starting with revision 206, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-
  doc/xubuntu-docs/lucid/revision/206, through revision 277,
  http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/xubuntu-
  docs/lucid/revision/277.  Since the changes have been committed to
  bazaar, I'm sure if I need to attach a patch, but I will do so per
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure.

  I don't believe there would be an regression in xubuntu-docs with the
  implementation of these changes.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: xubuntu-docs 9.10.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-27.49-generic 2.6.32.26+drm33.12
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-27-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Jan 20 22:10:51 2011
  Dependencies:
   
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: xubuntu-docs





More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors mailing list