[Bug 697023] Re: Sync codeblocks 10.05-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

[Artur Rona]

** Changed in: codeblocks (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Changed in: codeblocks (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: codeblocks (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Artur Rona (ari-tczew)

** Summary changed:

- Sync codeblocks 10.05-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
+ Sync codeblocks 10.05-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697023

Title:
  Sync codeblocks 10.05-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

Status in “codeblocks” package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: codeblocks

  Please sync codeblocks 10.05-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

  Explanation why Ubuntu delta can be dropped:
  All Ubuntu changes has been allied in Debian and also new package in Debian. This release fixing build failure because of binutils-gold with ld no-add-needed

  
  codeblocks (10.05-1) unstable; urgency=low

    * Initial Debian release (Closes: #304570)
    * Setting myself as Maintainer, original Ubuntu maintainer set as
      Uploader
    * Use debian/watch to get the original tarball, instead of an ad-hoc
      script
    * Wrap multivalue fields in debian/control
    * Update debian/copyright with lots of missing info, and use DEP-5
    * Add missing linkage to libX11 (03-fix_libX11_linkage.patch)
    * Use dh7 for debian/rules
    * Build-Depend on dh-autoreconf, since we need to re-generate autotools
      machinery (libtool version mismatch)
    * Migrate from libwxsmithlib0-dev to libwxsmithlib-dev, to ease
      future SONAME bumps.

   -- David Paleino <dapal at debian.org>  Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:58:57 +0100