[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox
Julien Lavergne
julien.lavergne at gmail.com
Thu Apr 21 17:31:28 UTC 2011
The virtual package sound like a good idea for oneiric. But for natty,
we should add others browsers not to force people to have firefox to use
Java. I updated the debdiff.
** Patch removed: "icedtea-web_1.1~20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/766559/+attachment/2074980/+files/icedtea-web_1.1%7E20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff
** Patch removed: "icedtea-web_1.1~20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/766559/+attachment/2074979/+files/icedtea-web_1.1%7E20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff
** Patch added: "icedtea-web_1.1~20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/766559/+attachment/2080146/+files/icedtea-web_1.1%7E20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff
** Changed in: icedtea-web (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766559
Title:
Forcing installation of firefox
Status in “icedtea-web” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
icedtea-plugin 1.1~20110406-0ubuntu2 have a strict and exclusive
depends on only 1 browser : firefox. But the plugin works also with
Chromium, without the need of firefox package.
Please add some alternative to firefox depends in debian/rules (line
72 : xulrunner_depends = firefox (>= 4.0~b7) | chromium-browser |
other_browser ....)
More information about the Ubuntu-sponsors
mailing list