[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

[Andrew Starr-Bochicchio]

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #271662
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271662

** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian)
   Importance: Undecided => Unknown

** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian)
       Status: New => Unknown

** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian)
 Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #271662

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089

Title:
  nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

Status in “nullmailer” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in “nullmailer” package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: nullmailer

  Yes, we know that the full LSB spec specifies that "-bs" be provided
  by the sendmail frontend. However, this interface is not supplied by
  ssmtp, nor is it supplied by the default lsb-invalid-mta (of course).
  I don't see why [only] nullmailer should have an explicit exclude
  entry against the simple "lsb" metapackage, contrary to what the
  Debian maintainers thought in 2004.

  If this is really the desired conflict behavior, though, there's still
  a change required (the inverse: add the conflict to ssmtp).