[Bug 677129] Re: Please merge xterm 266-1 (main) from debian unstable (main)

[Michael Vogt]

Thanks for the xterm merge! I have two questions:

1. xterm-266/debian/gbp.conf is modified but that is not documented in
the changelog

2. The debian/changelog file also mentions:
 "Remove setgid bit from the xterm binary (LP: #616100)"
but I can not find in the debdiff where that is done.
(the original debdiff is here for this bug is here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53489120/xterm_261-1ubuntu3.debdiff)

Could you please check if these questions ? In the meantime I will unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors as I would like to
clarify this before a new version is uploaded. Please just re-subscribe when the open questions are answered :)

Thanks,
 Michael

-- 
Please merge xterm 266-1 (main) from debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677129
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is a direct subscriber.

Status in “xterm” package in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
Binary package hint: xterm

xterm (266-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * New upstream release (Closes: #601103, yay for patience…):
     + Fix a regression in fontname logic from patch #263, thanks to
       Vincent Lefevre (Closes: #600707).
   * Fix watch file: use PASV mode.

 -- Cyril Brulebois <kibi at debian.org>  Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:23:02 +0200

xterm (264-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * New upstream release:
     + Fix active-icon in specific cases (Closes: #591265).
     + Fix pointer visibility issues (Closes: #594856).
     + Fix segmentation fault with -fb and other options (Closes: #600129).
   * Add myself to Uploaders.

 -- Cyril Brulebois <kibi at debian.org>  Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:53:57 +0200