[Bug 553398] Re: [ftbfs] condor at least on armel

[David Sugar]

I had been told in the past not to do it as a patch if it does not
already have a patch system in place and is originally from debian to
simplify future merges, but I see this has an entirely Ubuntu history
from the changelog.  So yes, I should have done it adding a patch system
and a patch for this one.

Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> Sponsoring this, thanks, David.
> 
> Can you please forward this patch to the upstream mailing list?  And in
> the future, put this sort of patch in a debian/patches directory?
> 
> Thanks!
> :-Dustin
> 
> ** Changed in: condor (Ubuntu)
>        Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
>

-- 
[ftbfs] condor at least on armel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors Team, which is a direct subscriber.

Status in “condor” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released

Bug description:
Binary package hint: condor

Currently fails to build from source.  This is a result of changes in include file order and dependencies in glibc on lucid.  I patched this to move where it includes and modifies <sys/time.h>