<div dir="ltr"><div>I've been looking into the build error using <a href="https://launchpad.net/~lvoytek/+archive/ubuntu/mysql-test-focal-build">ppa:lvoytek/mysql-test-focal-build</a>. I tried building the current release a few times, the previous release, and one with only one process instead of the normal four. All have failed for arm64 and the one with one job failed for the control of i386. I think mysql just needs more memory resources to build than what is provided on the current arm64 builder setup. Do you have any other suggestions for how to get it working?</div><div> </div><div>Thanks </div></div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 4:05 PM Bryce Harrington <<a href="mailto:bryce.harrington@canonical.com">bryce.harrington@canonical.com</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 09:34:18AM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote: > Bugs last updated on 2022-04-27 (Wednesday) > Date range identified as: "Thursday triage" > Found 23 bugs > > > Bugs worth mentioning: > > --- > > LP: #1400197 - *+ Triaged [run-one] - Duplicate line: backoff=0 > > Looks like a valid bug, but I think the true underlying question is: do > we want to keep byobu (and its dependency run-one) in main? > > Some time ago I filed this bug for discussion: > > <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byobu/+bug/1965944" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byobu/+bug/1965944</a> Can you arrange to bring this up at the next housekeeping meeting? Your rationale in the bug seems pretty solid, and I tend to agree. We should collaborate on whether there would be any side-effects, and what the proper set of procedural actions should be, and who would like to take them. > LP: #1899248 - * Fix Committed [mysql-8.0] - mysql server crashes during > install/update: Error: Unable to shut down server with process id X > > This is Fix Committed in Focal, Fix Released elsewhere, but there's a > FTBFS on arm64 (likely a OOM) requiring attention. Lena, are you already looking into this, or prefer to take it? If not, I can have a go. Offhand as a first step I suspect we can toss it in a PPA with arm64 enabled and see if it'll build there or not. Bryce > LP: #1902109 - Triaged [rsync] - rsync uses lchmod and fails in Ubuntu > >= 20.10 if /proc isn't mounted > > Activity comes from the linked upstream bug. Nothing to do from the > Ubuntu triage point of view. > > --- > > LP: #1970563 - New [qemu] - Qemu Debian 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6 deadlock bug > > An upstream fix is provided here, but what is missing is a proper > description of the problem. Marked Incomplete for now, but I think this > is SRU material. > > --- > > Cheers, > > Paride > > -- > ubuntu-server mailing list > <a href="mailto:ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com</a> > <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server</a> > More info: <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam</a> -- ubuntu-server mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server</a> More info: <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam</a></blockquote></div>