With all due respect, isn't this a problem if and only if default and less secure (or bad) configurations are used and/or the database server powering Bacula is a shared system with non-trusted users? <div class="gmail_quote"> On Feb 5, 2008 8:35 AM, Chuck Short <<a href="mailto:zulcss@gmail.com">zulcss@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hello, For the server package review specification (<a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerPackageReview" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerPackageReview</a>) we evaluated the Bacula backup solution. However,Bacula was rejected due to a feature in Bacula which exposed clear text passwords through the command line. This will not be resolved upstream in Debian. If people have an alternative that they would like to suggest please do so. Regards Chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server</a> More info: <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam</a> </blockquote></div>