MRE cards for pinot

[Bryce Harrington]

Following up on the question from this morning regarding the missing
cards for the MRE tasks for various packages, here's the config for what
we have presently:


                                                                            
    software = [
	{
            'software-name': 'dpdk',
            'software-type': 'deb',
            'information-type': 'public',
            'packages': ['dpdk'],
            'update-schedule': ['Mar', 'Jun', 'Sep', 'Dec'],
        },
        {
            'software-name': 'postgresql',
            'software-type': 'deb',
            'information-type': 'public',
            'packages': ['postgresql-10', 'postgresql-12', 'postgresql-13'],
            'update-schedule': ['Feb', 'May', 'Aug', 'Nov'],
        },
        {
            'software-name': 'open-vm-tools',
            'software-type': 'deb',
            'information-type': 'public',
            'packages': ['open-vm-tools'],
            'update-schedule': ['Apr', 'Oct'],
        },
        {
            'software-name': 'container-stack',
            'software-type': 'deb',
            'information-type': 'public',
            'packages': ['docker.io', 'containerd', 'runc'],
            'update-schedule': ['Feb', 'May', 'Aug', 'Nov'],
        },
    ]

IIRC eleven MREs were mentioned at the meeting today but unfortunately I
didn't capture notes on what those were.  So please review the above
list and let me know of additions or changes needed.

Notice that each "software" object can consist of one or more source
packages, so we can track sets like the container stack as well as
things like postgres that have different source packages per major
release.  Even accounting for these, my list has only 8 at most so I
know I'm missing some of our mentioned items.

I'll run the script to generate the tracking bugs for these after
tomorrow's meetings.

Bryce