Calling for Server Guide reviewers/contributors - - Raring

[Scott Kitterman]

You're missing my point.  I'm fine with the format.  I don't think it makes 
sense that Ubuntu core developers don't have the ability to commit changes to 
the bzr repository.

Scott K

On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 08:56:36 AM Spencer Krum wrote:
> I'm super excited about working with the Docs team over the next few weeks.
> I agree that the docs system is not as friendly as a wiki format or
> something but I'm pushing on regardless.
> 
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com>wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 10:32:48 PM Peter Matulis wrote:
> > > Hi everybody.
> > > 
> > > We're always in need of folks to review current instructions provided in
> > > the Ubuntu Server Guide and suggest improvements.  Please do check out
> > > the following link and help out where you can.
> > 
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam/SystemDocumentation/UbuntuServer
> > Gu> 
> > > ide
> > > 
> > > Instead of helping on a per-topic basis you can also offer fixes to
> > > existing bugs:
> > > 
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/serverguide
> > > 
> > > We have about a month to get this done (April 4).
> > > 
> > > I'm also looking for help in maintaining the guide in terms of
> > > validating reviews (merge proposals).
> > 
> > Every time I think about contributing to the server guide, I get almost
> > immediately demotivated once I realize I don't have commit access to the
> > repository.  If I can upload every package in the archive without review,
> > it
> > had never made sense to me that I can't fix the documentation.
> > 
> > Scott K
> > 
> > --
> > ubuntu-server mailing list
> > ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam