Ubuntu Server page doesn't mention 10.10?

Steven Miano mianosm at gmail.com
Mon Jan 17 16:52:43 UTC 2011


Seems like Monte is on it, maybe we'll see great contributions from him and
his eagle eyes!!!

~MianoSM

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:55 AM, John Pugh <john.pugh at canonical.com> wrote:

> Who is they? These are community driven pages so in this case
> they=community.
>
> ANYONE can update these specs...maybe mianosm would like to volunteer?
>
> I'll try to find some time to provide some updates....
>
> JP
>
> On 01/16/2011 01:11 PM, Monte Milanuk wrote:
> > Fwd of another email someone sent to me, instead of the list. Apparently
> > they don't see it as a problem that going on three months after a
> > release is out, the tech specs are still in 'draft' form and haven't
> > been touched since October...
> >
> >
> >> I see a download link, and when I click on it 10.10 is definitely an
> >> option.
> >>
> >> If you're talking about the "Technical Specs" portion, the reason is
> >> because it is currently a draft
> >> (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Server/TechSpecs/1010)
> >>
> >> If you look at all the other Technical Specs (under Technical
> >> Resources), they are all final, 10.10 simply hasn't been finished and
> >> is still a draft so not published on that page it would seem.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> MianoSM
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20110117/324f9ea3/attachment.html>


More information about the ubuntu-server mailing list