block p2p traffic

Bill beau at billbeau.net
Tue Jun 8 21:52:19 UTC 2010


I think mrtg is a little better. It graphs it out for ya so you can see 
where the peaks are. It is a fantastic tool to see in a quick glance 
what is going on with traffic and loads. If your working in say a data 
center where you need to monitor several routers you can graph each and 
every port. It was a great tool for DOS attacks we could see real quick 
where the trouble was.

On 6/8/2010 11:32 AM, Jorge Armando Medina wrote:
> Bill wrote:
>    
>> I also use snmp and mrtg. I like seeing how much traffic is coming
>> through during the night.
>>
>>      
> vnstat is good for that, here a example:
>
> # vnstat -i eth1 -d
>
>   eth1  /  daily
>
>      day         rx      |     tx      |  total
> ------------------------+-------------+----------------------------------------
>     10.05.      1.55 GB  |  614.03 MB  |    2.15 GB   %%%%%%:::
>     11.05.      1.95 GB  |  830.82 MB  |    2.76 GB   %%%%%%%%::::
>     12.05.      1.79 GB  |  897.25 MB  |    2.66 GB   %%%%%%%%::::
>     13.05.      1.75 GB  |  885.00 MB  |    2.61 GB   %%%%%%%::::
>     14.05.      2.31 GB  |  845.42 MB  |    3.14 GB   %%%%%%%%%%::::
>     15.05.    504.79 MB  |  372.75 MB  |  877.54 MB   %%:
>     16.05.     43.93 MB  |   92.58 MB  |  136.51 MB
>     17.05.      1.35 GB  |  746.94 MB  |    2.08 GB   %%%%%%:::
>     18.05.      1.91 GB  |    1.14 GB  |    3.05 GB   %%%%%%%%:::::
>     19.05.      1.38 GB  |  943.80 MB  |    2.30 GB   %%%%%%::::
>     20.05.      1.29 GB  |  852.66 MB  |    2.12 GB   %%%%%::::
>     21.05.      1.40 GB  |  729.03 MB  |    2.11 GB   %%%%%%:::
>     22.05.    394.85 MB  |  280.23 MB  |  675.08 MB   %%:
>     23.05.     78.72 MB  |  184.89 MB  |  263.61 MB   :
>     24.05.      1.42 GB  |  838.88 MB  |    2.24 GB   %%%%%%::::
>     25.05.      1.50 GB  |  871.23 MB  |    2.35 GB   %%%%%%::::
>     26.05.      1.61 GB  |  893.04 MB  |    2.48 GB   %%%%%%%::::
>     27.05.      1.67 GB  |  993.82 MB  |    2.65 GB   %%%%%%%%::::
>     28.05.      1.57 GB  |    1.71 GB  |    3.29 GB   %%%%%%%::::::::
>     29.05.    718.45 MB  |  360.40 MB  |    1.05 GB   %%%:
>     30.05.     44.14 MB  |   81.51 MB  |  125.65 MB
>     31.05.      1.04 GB  |  775.54 MB  |    1.80 GB   %%%%%:::
>     01.06.      1.15 GB  |  642.65 MB  |    1.78 GB   %%%%%:::
>     02.06.      1.56 GB  |    1.12 GB  |    2.68 GB   %%%%%%%:::::
>     03.06.      3.85 GB  |    1.62 GB  |    5.47 GB
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%:::::::
>     04.06.      2.32 GB  |    1.49 GB  |    3.81 GB   %%%%%%%%%%:::::::
>     05.06.    876.30 MB  |  449.40 MB  |    1.29 GB   %%%::
>     06.06.    117.62 MB  |  158.43 MB  |  276.05 MB   :
>     07.06.      1.99 GB  |    1.38 GB  |    3.37 GB   %%%%%%%%%::::::
>     08.06.    981.30 MB  |  712.62 MB  |    1.65 GB   %%%%:::
> ------------------------+-------------+----------------------------------------
>   estimated     1.70 GB  |    1.23 GB  |    2.93 GB
>
> Best regards.
>    
>> On 6/8/2010 8:52 AM, Eric Peters wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> I agree, proactively monitoring your network, makes for good practice,
>>> and also peace of mind. Security through obscurity, and passive
>>> reactionary monitoring is just asking for your network to be abused.
>>> Here are just some tools that I use on a daily basis which
>>> would easily detect p2p traffic and other abuses.
>>>
>>> Ntop        = /ntop/ is a network traffic probe that shows the network
>>> usage, similar to what the popular top Unix command does, but prettier!
>>> Snort       = /Snort/ is a free and open source network intrusion
>>> prevention system (NIPS) and network intrusion detection system (NIDS)
>>> Snorby     = Great front end for Snort, I'm currently working on a howto
>>> for this under Ubuntu 10.4
>>> ET Rules  = Emerging Threats is an open source community project with
>>> the fastest moving and most diverse Snort Signature set and firewall
>>> rules available
>>> Wireshark = /Wireshark/ is a network protocol analyzer
>>> nmap       = Security Scanner For Network Exploration&  computer scanning
>>>
>>> I'm curious as to what everyone else is using? Did I leave anything out?
>>> What's your thoughts on this subject?
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Michael Sanders<dsanders at jsu.edu
>>> <mailto:dsanders at jsu.edu>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>      I second Paul that is the way to go, once one finds out they have
>>>      eyes on them, it "can" fix it's self.  We had a problem with an
>>>      individual serving up files and the big bad record industry sent a
>>>      letter. That gave us the right to cut the user off. Once turned back
>>>      on behavior changed.   You will get some flack on the front end but
>>>      over time a majority of the community will get in line.
>>>
>>>         Danny Michael Sanders
>>>         IT Support Analyst
>>>
>>>      ----- "Paul Graydon"<paul at paulgraydon.co.uk
>>>      <mailto:paul at paulgraydon.co.uk>>  wrote:
>>>       >  That will help, but realistically you're going to have to block
>>>      every "high port" to stop P2P through that method.
>>>       >
>>>       >  The only way to effectively block P2P is to do packet sniffing
>>>      and analysis.. and that's just one big hassle.
>>>       >
>>>       >  My belief is this is usually the wrong way to tackle the problem,
>>>      looking for a technical solution to a human resource problem.
>>>       >  User education (and LARTing if necessary) is the key.  Using
>>>      software like Cacti to monitor and graph per-port traffic stats,
>>>      identify the largest bandwidth users and then focus on them and find
>>>      out just why they're using up so much bandwidth.
>>>       >  It's remarkable just how soon the problem all goes away after you
>>>      find just one or two individuals who are abusing the network
>>>      infrastructure and explain to them what the disciplinary procedures
>>>      are (or enact if it's appropriate and you have concrete evidence.)
>>>      The message soon spreads!
>>>       >
>>>       >  Paul
>>>       >
>>>       >  On 06/04/2010 05:03 AM, Greyson Farias wrote:
>>>
>>>          Hello,
>>>           >
>>>           >  You can use these iptables rules, because I don't like, don't
>>>          use and I don't wanna learn ufw. hehehehehe
>>>           >
>>>           >  # Block P2P connections
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 1214:1215 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 1214:1215 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 1981 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 1981 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 2037 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 2037 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 3501 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 3501 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 3531 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 3531 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 3587 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 3587 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 3955 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 3955 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 4242 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 4242 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 4661:4672 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 4661:4672 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 4688 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 4688 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 5121 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 5121 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 5662 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 5662 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 6085:6086 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 6085:6086 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 6346:6347 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 6346:6347 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 6699 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 6699 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 6881:6889 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 6881:6889 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 8473 -j DROP
>>>           >  iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 8473 -j DROP
>>>           >
>>>           >
>>>           >
>>>           >
>>>           >  2010/6/4 Kaushal Shriyan<kaushalshriyan at gmail.com
>>>          <mailto:kaushalshriyan at gmail.com>>
>>>           >
>>>
>>>              Hi,
>>>               >
>>>               >  is there a howto for blocking p2p traffic on ubuntu 10.04
>>>              server ?
>>>               >
>>>               >  Thanks,
>>>               >
>>>               >  Kaushal
>>>               >
>>>               >  --
>>>               >  ubuntu-server mailing list
>>>               >  ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>              <mailto:ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>               >  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
>>>               >  More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>>>               >
>>>
>>>
>>>           >
>>>
>>>           >  --
>>>           >  Greyson Farias
>>>           >  Técnico em Informática - CREA/AC 9329TD
>>>           >  Ubuntu user
>>>           >  Eu prefiro receber documentos em ODF.
>>>           >  http://ubuntu.com/download/getubuntu
>>>           >  Blog Ubuntu Acre: http://ubuntu-ac.org
>>>           >
>>>
>>>
>>>       >
>>>       >
>>>
>>>      --
>>>      ubuntu-server mailing list
>>>      ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com<mailto:ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>      https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
>>>      More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>
>>      
>
>    




More information about the ubuntu-server mailing list