Creating a encrypted directory during the server installation
Rick Clark
rick.clark at ubuntu.com
Tue Sep 23 13:27:07 UTC 2008
On Monday 22 September 2008 21:40:56 James Troup wrote:
> Rick Clark <rick.clark at ubuntu.com> writes:
> > While I think we need to take a very close look at installer
> > usability in the future, I think that adding htis question makes
> > little difference. It is easy to preseed it and avoid all
> > questions.
>
> Err, what?
>
> a) if we take that attitude to each new potential question, the we'll
> soon lose sight of the 'minimal questions during install' goal
> that was (is?) an original feature/target of Ubuntu
My point was that this one question makes little difference to me personally.
We are planning on looking at the installer for Jaunty, and adding this for
this release, to help make a feature visible seems worth it.
I am far more concerned about the tasksel list growing and the annoying
keyboard detection.
Minimal questions during install has not, as long as I have been around, been
an expressed goal of the server edition. I do agree, however, that it is a
good thing to make the install as simple and streamlined as possible. I just
don't believe asking this one question has a huge effect.
>
> b) preseed is great, but I think calling it 'easy' is , well,
> optimistic
>
That entirely depends on who you are talking about. I found it to be
relatively straight forward.
> The encrypted directory feature is great stuff but I really don't
> think it's worth adding as a question to all server installs for it;
> at least not in the default mode.
>
> --
> James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20080923/2b79e081/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ubuntu-server
mailing list