Moving w3m out of standard

[Soren Hansen]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:17:47AM -0500, James Dinkel wrote:
>> See, you happen to need to access documentation that's stored in man
>> page format. Others are in a situation where the packages they use
>> store their documentation in html format. Without an html interpreter
>> they're screwed. In this context, groff and w3m are exactly the same,
>> so if we remove one, why not the other?
> I already admitted to pandering to myself.  And if groff is gone, then
> I wouldn't be heart-broken.  I would just include it in my standard
> server set up, or install the package who's man page I need to read on
> one of my handy-dandy test servers.

I'm completely missing why you are so determined to make the server
install less useful by default?

-- 
Soren Hansen               | 
Virtualisation specialist  | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd.             | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20080623/e5bd37e0/attachment.pgp>