Moving w3m out of standard
dustin.kirkland at gmail.com
Mon Jun 16 18:14:59 UTC 2008
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:08 PM, James Dinkel <jdinkel at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would read the documentation on another system then, assuming the
> system referred to is a production server and not a test server. Even
> it there is a viable need for an interactive web browser, I think the
> use case would be so rare and added to the fact that people will have
> differing preferences on which text browser is best, that including
> any one in the default seed is a bad idea.
This sounds reasonable to me. As mentioned above, I think it can be
handled in the Ubuntu Server Guide document with a list of viable text
browser alternatives and a pointer to the apt-get command.
More information about the ubuntu-server