Bug 2 review pls [was Re: Bug 0 review pls]

[James Dinkel]

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Dustin Kirkland <kirkland at canonical.com> wrote:
> Sorry, let me expand that...
>
> I like the idea of setting up a "Bug #2" that is similar to "Bug #1",
> except focusing on the Server market.  I'd keep it brief, and high
> level (analogous to Bug #1).
>
> Then, spin off your Blueprints/Specifications/Bugs as necessary, and
> link them back to Bug #1.  Hopefully you'll work on some of them
> yourself.  Perhaps you can get motivated community members to take on
> a few more.  These should be specific, directed work items, atomic and
> solvable.
>
> :-Dustin

I like "Bug #2" better, also.  Although, I hope Shuttleworth is fine
with that 8-o

James