Main Inclusion Report for Bacula

Aaron Kincer kincera at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 14:16:44 UTC 2008


With all due respect, isn't this a problem if and only if default and less
secure (or bad) configurations are used and/or the database server powering
Bacula is a shared system with non-trusted users?


On Feb 5, 2008 8:35 AM, Chuck Short <zulcss at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> For the server package review specification
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerPackageReview) we evaluated the Bacula
> backup solution. However,Bacula was rejected due to a feature in
> Bacula which exposed clear text passwords through the command line.
> This will not be resolved upstream in Debian.
>
> If people have an alternative that they would like to suggest please do
> so.
>
> Regards
> Chuck
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20080205/a2b5cbba/attachment.html>


More information about the ubuntu-server mailing list