Main Inclusion Report for Bacula

Aaron Kincer kincera at
Tue Feb 5 14:16:44 UTC 2008

With all due respect, isn't this a problem if and only if default and less
secure (or bad) configurations are used and/or the database server powering
Bacula is a shared system with non-trusted users?

On Feb 5, 2008 8:35 AM, Chuck Short <zulcss at> wrote:

> Hello,
> For the server package review specification
> ( we evaluated the Bacula
> backup solution. However,Bacula was rejected due to a feature in
> Bacula which exposed clear text passwords through the command line.
> This will not be resolved upstream in Debian.
> If people have an alternative that they would like to suggest please do
> so.
> Regards
> Chuck
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server at
> More info:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the ubuntu-server mailing list