Main Inclusion Report for Bacula

Nick Barcet nick.barcet at canonical.com
Tue Feb 5 13:40:18 UTC 2008


Chuck Short wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> For the server package review specification
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerPackageReview) we evaluated the Bacula
> backup solution. However,Bacula was rejected due to a feature in
> Bacula which exposed clear text passwords through the command line.
> This will not be resolved upstream in Debian.
> 
> If people have an alternative that they would like to suggest please do so.

Orginally, my proposal was to include Amanda. We switched to Bacula
during UDS as it seemed more feature rich and popular, AFAIR.  Shall we
give a shot at it?  Do you see something better to do server backup in
the OSS space?

Nick


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20080205/7ef7e1a2/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-server mailing list