Xen in Hardy
Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva
leandro at limaesilva.com.br
Fri Apr 11 21:44:30 UTC 2008
Mark,
Of course, of course... Maybe I sounded like I was criticizing Canonical for
that, but I wasn't. When your resources have some kind of limit you have to
make choices.
I'm also considering trying KVM on my solutions.
Cheers, Leandro.
2008/4/11, Mark Goldfinch <g at g.org.nz>:
>
> Leandro,
>
> Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva wrote:
>
> > I think that Canonical's choice for KVM have already made it clear that
> > they won't support Xen at least for a while.
> >
>
> I think Canonical's decision to support KVM reflects the level of
> complexity involved between the two solutions..
>
> Also given that Xen is moving closer to complete support within the
> mainline kernel reflects a major milestone which KVM has already achieved..
>
> I suspect Canonical just doesn't have the dedicated resources required to
> do complete support of Xen within their support program. This isn't
> necessarilly a reflection of their desire to support Xen, another example
> would be Sun not having native support of Xen within customer shipped
> versions of Solaris yet..
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>
--
Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20080411/e66ef729/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-server
mailing list