[Bug 1657305] Re: percona cluster getting wrong private ip

[James Page]

I appreciate the need to move charms to the network-get --primary-
address charm hook tool to support use of network spaces, but I still
feel that there might be a 'undefined behaviour' use case in this code
path.

If a user does not bind a relation or extra-binding, then what gets
returned from network-get --primary-address <relation-name>?  Does the
unbound, default, behaviour mimic what unit-get private-address does?

** Package changed: juju-core (Ubuntu) => juju (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657305

Title:
  percona cluster getting wrong private ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/opnfv/+bug/1657305/+subscriptions