[Bug 1423626] Re: Inconsistent device naming depending on install method - biosdevname/no biosdevname

[Ray Wang]

I see the names are consistent across MAAS UI and deployment. However,
during the commissioning stage, I guess the biosdevname is not
installed, so the names on MAAS are all ethX, so after the system are
provisioned, the names in the OS are all ethX. I would rather see emX
and pXpX instead.

I run into a problem that i use bonding with ethX (as it is ethX in OS).
and the mac address of ethX was changed, so bonding fails. I bet if i
use emX naming, that shouldn't be a problem?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423626

Title:
  Inconsistent device naming depending on install method -
  biosdevname/no biosdevname

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1423626/+subscriptions