[Bug 1389954] [NEW] Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable
Forest
1389954 at bugs.launchpad.net
Thu Nov 6 04:29:08 UTC 2014
Public bug reported:
The lxc package on ubuntu does almost nothing to help a user enable DNS
resolution for containers via dnsmaq, let alone discover that it is
possible. How about enabling it by default? I think all it would take is
adding server=/lxc/10.0.3.1 to a file in /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d/
and uncommenting LXC_DOMAIN="lxc" in /etc/default/lxc-net.
Even if there's a good reason not to enable this by default, shouldn't
it at least be clearly documented someplace obvious instead of buried in
a system config file with a misleading comment that mentions the wrong
dnsmasq file to edit? (The one currently mentioned by /etc/default/lxc-
net does nothing on ubuntu desktop systems, because ubuntu's
NetworkManager starts dnsmasq with a special config directory.)
** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
The lxc package on ubuntu does almost nothing to help a user enable DNS
resolution for containers via dnsmaq, let alone discover that it is
possible. How about enabling it by default? I think all it would take is
adding server=/lxc/10.0.3.1 to a file in /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d/
and uncommenting LXC_DOMAIN="lxc" in /etc/default/lxc-net.
Even if there's a good reason not to enable this by default, shouldn't
it at least be clearly documented someplace obvious instead of buried in
a system config file with a misleading comment that mentions the wrong
- dnsconf file to edit? (The dnsconf file path currently mentioned in
+ dnsmasq file to edit? (The dnsconf file path currently mentioned in
/etc/default/lxc-net does nothing on ubuntu desktop systems, because
NetworkManager starts dnsconf with a special config directory.)
** Description changed:
The lxc package on ubuntu does almost nothing to help a user enable DNS
resolution for containers via dnsmaq, let alone discover that it is
possible. How about enabling it by default? I think all it would take is
adding server=/lxc/10.0.3.1 to a file in /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d/
and uncommenting LXC_DOMAIN="lxc" in /etc/default/lxc-net.
Even if there's a good reason not to enable this by default, shouldn't
it at least be clearly documented someplace obvious instead of buried in
a system config file with a misleading comment that mentions the wrong
- dnsmasq file to edit? (The dnsconf file path currently mentioned in
- /etc/default/lxc-net does nothing on ubuntu desktop systems, because
- NetworkManager starts dnsconf with a special config directory.)
+ dnsmasq file to edit? (The one currently mentioned by /etc/default/lxc-
+ net does nothing on ubuntu desktop systems, because ubuntu's
+ NetworkManager starts dnsmasq with a special config directory.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389954
Title:
Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1389954/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-server-bugs
mailing list