[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs
Sean Channel
1056103 at bugs.launchpad.net
Mon Oct 1 17:10:28 UTC 2012
I must agree w/ Tv that keeping the docs build separate helps source
users who don't need to deal with all that. Many other projects actually
do that ('cd doc; make html') due to substantial additional build deps.,
and I think I can take some cues from that.
The top Makefile could just include an optional target to descend into
doc and build that package, and the separate 'debian' there can be
largely or entirely generated from the top level (e.g. symlinked as much
as possible).
I'll put something together in a github clone you can look at (later
this week).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103
Title:
no docs package / html docs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-server-bugs
mailing list