[Blueprint servercloud-q-server-iso-tests-review] Server ISO Tests Review

[James Page]

Blueprint changed by James Page:

Whiteboard changed:
  Summary of Discussion at UDS:
  
  Current test cases are OK - but all need to be migrated to UTAH early during the Q cycle.
  Some gaps in upgrade testing - members of the server team to identify suitable test cases so that the QA team can setup more regular upgrade testing.
  More requirements identified for UTAH - specifically multi-nic and USB install support.
  Still need to ensure that we get good manual testing coverage at key milestones - ubuntu-server list will be used to call for testing.
  MAAS test cases need some improvement and automation.
  
  Session notes: http://pad.ubuntu.com/uds-q-servercloud-q-server-iso-
  tests-review
  
  Assumptions:
  
  - No new tests will be automated using the existing Ubuntu Server ISO Testing Framework.
  - All existing tests will be migrated by the Platform QA team as UTAH comes online.
+ - Existing test format is still valid for UTAH and existing tests can be extended in place.
  - The existing upgrade testing framework can support the requirements of the server team.
  - OpenStack testing is not covered under the scope of this blueprint.
  - Preseed based install testing is still sufficient to prove installer testing.
  - Manual testing still has its place a key points in the development cycle.
  
  User Stories:  N/A
  Test Plan: N/A
  Release Note: N/A

-- 
Server ISO Tests Review
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-server-iso-tests-review