[Bug 1040800] Re: res_config_sqlite should be ported to sqlite3

Dmitrijs Ledkovs launchpad at surgut.co.uk
Fri Aug 24 00:01:08 UTC 2012


Right now, it's simply a MOTU Developer initiative. Not a concrete / release team approved goal.
I am trying to triange and find packages that:
* depend on sqlite2
* have not been ported to sqlite3 OR do not have sqlite3 equivalent packaged

Binary package asterisk-modules depends on both sqlite2 & 3.

Most of the modules in that package provide both sqlite2 & 3 versions of
modules where appropriate.

There is: res_config_sqlite module which links against sqlite2 and there
is no res_config_sqlite3 provided.

So if we do decide to drop sqlite2, then there will be loss of
functionality (res_config_sqlite module) with no upgrade path, cause
there is no res_config_sqlite3 module. Hence this wishlist bug to port
that individual module.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040800

Title:
  res_config_sqlite should be ported to sqlite3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1040800/+subscriptions



More information about the Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list