[Bug 662398] [NEW] Version number in package name makes life hard
tjn at wetafx.co.nz
Sun Oct 17 22:48:14 BST 2010
Public bug reported:
I'm sure this has been noted before but I can't find an explanation.
Why are non-major version numbers in the package names for the openldap libraries? Package names like 'libldap-2.4-2' seem to make it unnecessarily hard to package third party software with sensible dependencies.
Is there a good excuse for this?
I don't know a huge amount about debian packaging but is there an
obvious way another package could specify something like "libldap >
2.3"? Would that be possible if the libldap2.4blahblah package had a
** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
Version number in package name makes life hard
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu.
More information about the Ubuntu-server-bugs