[Bug 487275] Re: eucalyptus.conf should not be a conffile
Launchpad Bug Tracker
487275 at bugs.launchpad.net
Mon Jan 11 04:15:08 GMT 2010
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 1.6.2~bzr1120-0ubuntu7
---------------
eucalyptus (1.6.2~bzr1120-0ubuntu7) lucid; urgency=low
[ Thierry Carrez ]
* debian/eucalyptus-sc.config: Ask for cluster name on SC-only installs
(LP: #497831)
[ Dustin Kirkland ]
* debian/eucalyptus-common.install, debian/eucalyptus-common.manpages,
debian/eucalyptus-common.postinst, debian/eucalyptus-common.preinst,
debian/eucalyptus-defaults.conf, debian/eucalyptus-nc.postinst,
debian/eucalyptus.conf, tools/euca_conf.8, tools/euca_conf.in:
- Massive rework fixing LP: #487275, improving the conffile handling
of eucalyptus.conf and euca_conf
+ create /usr/share/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-defaults.conf,
which contains generic, distro defaults
+ first source /usr/share/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-defaults.conf,
in eucalyptus.conf
+ next source /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-local.conf, in
eucalyptus.conf, containing site-specific customizations
+ finally, allow for admin customizations at the bottom of
eucalyptus.conf
+ move euca_conf.1 to euca_conf.8, and actually install it,
LP: #458211
+ fix tools/euca_conf.in to use $FILE instead of eucalyptus.conf
+ have tools/euca_conf.in write to eucalyptus-local.conf
+ drop serveral postinst calls to euca_conf, now that these
defaults are set/sourced in eucalyptus-defaults.conf
+ maintainer script fixes seeding eucalyptus-local.conf on new
installs, moving existing eucalyptus.conf data to
eucalyptus-local.conf on upgrades
* debian/eucalyptus-common.links, debian/eucalyptus-common.manpages,
tools/eucalyptus.conf.5: move most of the inline documentation from
eucalyptus.conf to a manpage, LP: #458211
-- Dustin Kirkland <kirkland at ubuntu.com> Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:08:59 -0600
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
eucalyptus.conf should not be a conffile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
More information about the Ubuntu-server-bugs
mailing list