[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data

Boris Devouge boris.devouge at canonical.com
Tue Feb 2 22:01:36 GMT 2010


Thanks for all comment and explanations for the DNS services of
eucalyptus, however it is not accepted/possible in all cases, and not
the whole issue.

There is still an issue where we do not get an full IP attributed as a
hostname (which would help already assuming the uniqueness of hostnames
and make things work), but only the first 3 digit, so '172' in the case
as only the private IP space is visible from the instance.

The main issue is that '172' seems to break many things, Jboss running
RMI on http://172:8083 but also other basic networking tools... and
seems to not comply with what is an allowed hostname by convention.
Could we not generate an unique hostname with random bits everytime, and
let people the option then to edit / have them in DNS if desired?

Courtesy of Andrew Glen-Young, the following snippet of code, work
around for current issue, not sure if it would help:

https://pastebin.canonical.com/27281/

-- 
Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.



More information about the Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list