[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
ivoks at grad.hr
Sat Sep 27 11:06:24 BST 2008
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:25:55 -0000
Kern Sibbald <kern at sibbald.com> wrote:
> OK, no problem. I didn't take offense, hope you didn't, but just
> wanted to clarify.
Of course not.
> The bug in the main Bacula 2.2.8 Branch HEAD is fixed because the
> code is identical to the current 2.4.2 code. That is if 2.2.8 is
> fully and correctly patched with the released patches, it should have
> this bug and others fixed. It is possible that there were confusions
> with the patches in getting from the first 2.2.8 to the version that
> is in the SVN.
Oh! Mea culpa... I didn't know 2.2.8 is still getting patches. I'm
checking out source as I write this...
> OK, if you have a 2.2.8 src/filed/backup.c that is the same as on
> 2.4.2, then the bug *should* be fixed. If not, I will be worried ...
I've seen your comments on bug in bacula buglist, but we really need
Sergio to confirm this.
Thank you for the info!
[SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.
More information about the Ubuntu-server-bugs