[Merge] lp:~vorlon/process-cpp/explicit-gcc-version into lp:process-cpp
Marcus Tomlinson
marcus.tomlinson at canonical.com
Sat Jul 12 18:45:35 UTC 2014
Review: Abstain
> Marcus,
>
> "prerequisite" implies that the other branch should be merged independently
> and that my branch should be merged afterwards. As I described at
> <https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/process-cpp/explicit-gcc-
> version/+merge/224755>, which I have marked as rejected, Thomas's branch is
> broken and causes a build failure on one architecture and can therefore not be
> landed. There is no reason for these branches to be landed serially when the
> first one is broken.
Ah, forgive me for finding this arrangement of branches confusing. So there is a 3rd branch with the exact same stuff in it? Perhaps you should reject lp:~thomas-voss/process-cpp/bump-so-name-and-major-version as well. Its difficult to tell which branch is the master.
>
> As for asking tvoss to include the changes in his own branch, this is part of
> a landing of 17 distinct branches that have been pending since the 27th of
> June and are blocking a toolchain update for Utopic. As I'm working on
> getting the landing unstuck by clearing the build failures, it would not make
> sense to wait until Thomas can merge these changes into his branch when I can
> just raise a new MP myself.
I've clearly intruded on something you're in control of. Sorry.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/process-cpp/explicit-gcc-version/+merge/226569
Your team Ubuntu Phablet Team is subscribed to branch lp:process-cpp.
More information about the Ubuntu-reviews
mailing list