Please remove src:glusterfs-11.0 from mantic-proposed, see #2035127 and #2031905

Andreas Hasenack andreas at canonical.com
Wed Sep 13 12:50:32 UTC 2023


Thanks!

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:59 AM Christopher James Halse Rogers
<raof at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12 2023 at 13:54:00 -0300, Andreas Hasenack <andreas at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, could someone please remove src:glusterfs-11 (and its binary builds) from mantic-proposed? I previously asked on irc[1], but have now filed a separate bug[2] speficically for this removal. 1. https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/09/08/%23ubuntu-release.html#t12:12 https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/09/08/%23ubuntu-release.html#t15:55 https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/09/11/%23ubuntu-release.html#t12:14 https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/09/11/%23ubuntu-release.html#t17:27 2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/2035127
>
>
> Thanks for the reminder. I've now done this. Enjoy your samba rebuild!
>
> Is it deliberate, or an oversight¹, that samba migrated out of proposed with a freshly-unsatisfiable Recommends?

I didn't do anything to force a migration. I wonder if unsatisfiable
recommends is not a blocker for the migration machinery?



More information about the Ubuntu-release mailing list