Zest Zaphus - Beta 1
flocculant at gmx.co.uk
Wed Feb 22 12:08:23 UTC 2017
Just to go back on this - the dates are not an issue.
< Laney> flocculant: Would be nice if you could get people to chill out
over the dates too
On 21/02/17 22:46, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Walter Lapchynski pointed out that the timestamps on iso.qa.ubuntu.com don't match up.
> Here's the current timestamps on all of the products:
> Kubuntu - 20170220
> Lubuntu Desktop - 20170220
> Lubuntu Alternate - 20170221.2
> Ubuntu Budgie - 20170219
> Ubuntu GNOME - 20170219
> Ubuntu Kylin - 20170219
> Ubuntu Studio - 20170219
> Xubuntu - 20170220
> I'm aware of the Lubuntu Alternate image respin, as Adam Conrad fixed an unusual build issue with the images and had to respin (thanks Adam!), but this is generally unusual for the other timestamps to be mixed up like this.
> I also remember that when I added Lubuntu builds to Beta 1, Lubuntu had 20170220 and the rest had 20170219.
> So what now? Do we respin images or do we keep them as is? Is this a bad thing?
More information about the Ubuntu-release