glibc/eglibc: proposed promotion to security/updates

[Barry Warsaw]

On May 25, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:

>I guess the best thing would be to actually fix tests :-) For most of
>the broken ones we earn from Debian we actually have overrides, but
>they tend to be maintained for the devel series only. E. g. a test
>might get fixed in devel, we drop the "force-badtest" override, but
>now the test would appear as a failure in stables. Perhaps we need
>per-series overrides to clean this up.

What are the plans for gating promotion in Debian to passing CI?  Right now
since that doesn't happen, I suspect we only find out about most failures once
they're imported into Ubuntu and they become obvious over here.  I think
turning it on in Debian would go a long way to making sure the existing
autopkgtests we inherit get more attention upstream of us.

Cheers,
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20160525/fb2f0358/attachment.pgp>